Ainsi parlait Geoffrey Lee :
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:38:01PM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote:
> > On Monday 21 January 2002 19:00, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:22:16PM +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > >> as the title says...
> > >> gpc is gnu pascal, BTW
> > >
> > > Why another pascal compiler?
> >
> > This from a man who already ships 4 C compilers, 2 Java compilers, 2
> > native assemblers, 2 Prologs, 2 Haskells, at least 3 LISPs and a
> > partridge in a pear tree?
>
> Well, you wish to have (yet) another compiler?
>
> Remember, the distrib is quite big already, we have 3 CD (inc. contrib),
> my personal opinion is that only include it if you think that it will
> really benefit people, or if assuming that gpc is better then why keep fpc
> around?
I would say let's include gpc in main, and either drop fpc or switch it to
contrib. We're building a gnu/linux distro, not a borland/linux one :-)
--
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
