On Tuesday 29 Jan 2002 16:41, Alexander Skwar wrote: > So sprach �Stefan Siegel� am 2002-01-29 um 11:33:17 +0100 : > > Linux XFS Font server. So it is needet! Maybe not for for everyone > > out there, but there are still lots of users ... > > Really "lots" of users? Well, you may need it, but for instance I > don't have any ext2 filesystems, and also no ide stuff. But still > these "drivers" are compiled into the kernel. For *me* it would be > better if these were modules. > > What I'm meaning to say: There might be some uses of XFS, but I'd say > for the majority of the target audience (home users), XFS is not > needed. So it should be removed.
Absolutely right, Alexander. > That's actually the same reasoning > why ide stuff and ext2 is in the kernel. So if this holds true for the > kernel, it should also hold true for XFS. > > Alexander Skwar -- Peter Ruskin, Wrexham, Wales. AMD Athlon XP 1600+, 512MB RAM. Registered Linux User 219434. Mandrake Linux release 8.1 (Vitamin) Kernel 2.4.8-34.1mdk-win4lin, XFree86 4.1.0, patch level 21mdk. KDE: 2.2.2. Qt: 2.3.2. Up 2 hours 15 minutes.
