On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 Jan 2002 16:41, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > So sprach �Stefan Siegel� am 2002-01-29 um 11:33:17 +0100 :
> > > Linux XFS Font server. So it is needet! Maybe not for for everyone
> > > out there, but there are still lots of users ...
> >
> > Really "lots" of users? Well, you may need it, but for instance I
> > don't have any ext2 filesystems, and also no ide stuff. But still
> > these "drivers" are compiled into the kernel. For *me* it would be
> > better if these were modules.
> >
> > What I'm meaning to say: There might be some uses of XFS, but I'd say
> > for the majority of the target audience (home users), XFS is not
> > needed. So it should be removed.
>
> Absolutely right, Alexander.
No i dont see any logic in this statement.
What I'm meaning to say: There might be some uses of any software, but
I'd say for the majority of the target audience (home users), any software
is not needed. So it should be removed.
(or even better replace "any software" with "software")
Do you agree Alexander?
--
9:21pm up 34 days, 8:32, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
O //
<==-} -> .--._.-^-(.}
)' /{ ( \d
./\, ) -._.- >
/ / `\ /' GNU -=LFS*1482=-
I am not 31337. But I can use the Vi editor... ;-0
