�pascal� sagte am 2002-02-13 um 19:55:30 +0100 :
> all this could be disabled when not called by rpmdrake, humm ?

Hmm, haven't had a look at rpmdrake, but does rpmdrake *ALWAYS*
automatically do a urpmi.update?  If not, then it might be the case that
the user (for whatever reason) calls urpmi.update manually to later on
use the results with rpmdrake.

However, it might be nice to add a --switch to urpmi.update which
disables fetching of these files.  But the default should stay as it is
right now.  And the messages also shouldn't be surpressed.

Alexander Skwar
-- 
How to quote:   http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage:       http://www.iso-top.de      |     Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   iso-top.de - Die g�nstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen
                       Uptime: 12 hours 16 minutes

Reply via email to