On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 11:25, Fabrice FACORAT wrote: > > > First keep in mind, when I say it was to be a replacement for Bastille > > Linux and msec, this was true at one time, but not so anymore. > > BUS, is still now, an orphan project. > > I think the name would need to be changed. > > > > Well, I think that firewall configuration is moot. From what I > > understand wizdrake does a pretty good job. > > don't talk about that ! I hate wizard since last time i test them ! On > top of that they need java ahhhhhhhhhhhh >
HA I did not know that. That is pretty gross IMHO. However, I still, wouldn't like to focus on having BUS do firewall config, it needs a good stable base : ) And this is all in the context that BUS (whatever it would be renamed to) brought back to life : ) -- Bryan Paxton Public PGP key: http://www.deadhorse.net/bpaxton.gpg "Winning gives birth to hostility. Losing, one lies down in pain. The calmed lie down with ease, having set winning & losing aside." Dhp. 201
