On ���, 2002-02-25 at 14:15, Florin wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Borsenkow Andrej) writes: > > > I installed SNF (using urpmi) it never asked me to install shorewall (I > > specifically removed Bastille). I went into Firewall Configuration said > > I want to start firewall - no problems, no errors, nothing. As if it has > > been successfully started. > > > > I guess if we rely on shorewall we should Require shorewall? > > > (florin@penguin)[~]-% rpm -qpR snf-en-8.2-3mdk.noarch.rpm|grep shorewall > > shorewall >
Ahh ... O.K. sorry, it was naat-frontend-www-en I have installed. What is the difference between naat and snf then? Shuld not naat (frontend or backend - do not know) require snf? -andrej
