Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > On ���, 2002-02-25 at 14:15, Florin wrote: > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Borsenkow Andrej) writes: >> >> >>>I installed SNF (using urpmi) it never asked me to install shorewall (I >>>specifically removed Bastille). I went into Firewall Configuration said >>>I want to start firewall - no problems, no errors, nothing. As if it has >>>been successfully started. >>> >>>I guess if we rely on shorewall we should Require shorewall? >>> >> >>(florin@penguin)[~]-% rpm -qpR snf-en-8.2-3mdk.noarch.rpm|grep shorewall > >>shorewall >> >> > > Ahh ... O.K. sorry, it was naat-frontend-www-en I have installed. > > What is the difference between naat and snf then? Shuld not naat > (frontend or backend - do not know) require snf? > > -andrej >
Other way around. snf-<lang> is a virtual package requiring all the rpms to be able to use snf, including naat-frontend-www-<lang>, naat-backend etc ... -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/gpg.key
