On 26 Feb 2002, Juan Quintela wrote:

> >>>>> "st�phane" == St�phane Teletch�a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> st�phane> Le Mardi 26 F�vrier 2002 13:14, Juan Quintela a �crit :
> >> >>>>> "j" == J A Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> 
> j> Hi.
> j> Just read subject. Really, it is just -rc3. I have not followed latest
> j> chagelogs, but sometime I saw an rc2...
> >> 
> >> Not, we are based in rc4 :p
> >> 
> j> Sure we are on time for 8.2, aren't we ???
> >> 
> >> I don't think so, I asked upstream if we can change the name, and
> >> still not answer.  Anyways, rc4 is better than final, then .....
> >> 
> >> Later, Juan.
> st�phane> I'm confused ...
> st�phane> Why not giving out a functional, deeply patched 2.4.17 instead of trying 
>to 
> st�phane> mix with a 2.4.18 or a so-called rc ?
> 
> As I told before, there is the same.  Our kernel rpm is based in
> 2.4.18-rc4, and it is the same than 2.4.18 (final).
> 
> The question was if I can change the name of the kernel from
> 2.4.17-22mdk to 2.4.18-1mdk, and that was what I asked upstream, but I
> don't think that we can so late in the game.
> 
> Later, Juan.
> 
> 
> 
Most of what I have read here is all wrong, go read lkml. read the
changelog:

Update: The SET_PERSONALITY fix in rc4 has _not_
been included in the final 2.4.18 by mistake.

final:

- No changes have been made between -final 
  and -rc4.

2.4.18 final is really -rc3 the -rc4 patch wasn't included in the final
tarball.  
-- 
"After I bit the head off the bat, the animal rights people came after me 
every night. Probably right after they finished eating their Colonel Sande
or whatever, telling me I shouldn't be biting the heads off bats. I'll tell
you what bats taste like. Like a good McDonald's."-Ozzy Osbourne (1985)

Chad Young           
Registered Linux User #195191
@ http://counter.li.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Linux localhost 2.4.18-ac1 #1 Mon Feb 25 22:51:48 AST 2002 i686 unknown
  3:55pm  up 42 min,  1 user,  load average: 1.47, 1.49, 1.18


Reply via email to