Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Still I feel that even if I used wrong words, the meaning was right. I
> remember time when I read every post on cooker. Now I mostly read either
> posts from known persons or posts with obviously interesting subjects.
> Because chances are too high that any other post would contain "why this
> or that does not work?" without much explanation what was "this" or
> "that" or what "does not work" mean.
I think it has always been like this. Though probably in beta
moments, there are more "newbies". But OTOH we badly need these
bugreports.
I personally use scoring on people and themes; I don't read posts
which only contain quotes on the first 50 lines ("respect the
netiquette or be silently ignored"); I don't read posts which
only have "bug" as subject, or another irrelevant/generic
subject. With these few rules Cooker ML is still usable for me..
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://www.frozen-bubble.org/
