On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 18:31, J.A. Magallon wrote: > On 2002.03.12 Brad Felmey wrote: > >Is this correct? I thought one of the ideas behind source was to > >eliminate dependencies like this. Not wanting that screwed-up bastard > >stepchild known as gcc3 on my box in the first place is why I need to > >build from source. Now I find it's a build requirement? > > Afraid of a real compiler ;) ??
Not at all. In fact, that's part of the problem. I installed gcc3 when it very first came out, and I'm still so PO'd over how badly I got hosed over that fiasco that I'm averse to trying it again until there is a whole lot of empirical evidence that it's a different (better) animal than it was the last time I tried it. -- Brad Felmey
