On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 06:09:14PM -0600, Brad Felmey wrote:
> Is this correct? I thought one of the ideas behind source was to
> eliminate dependencies like this.
Yes, but we're still on the road :)
> Not wanting that screwed-up bastard stepchild known as gcc3
What is the problem? urpmi gcc3 and you'll have both on your system
with gcc3 NOT default, so openoffice compilation will be happy and you
won't screw up anything.
Nor gcc-2.95 nor gcc-2.96 nor gcc-3.0 is perfect. There are still many
apps (especially C++) that compiles with one and doesn't with another.
Every known compiler has bugs and incompatibities (not just gcc
problem), but we're getting better and better and we still have free
choices ... Be happy ;-)
--
Martin Mačok http://underground.cz/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://Xtrmntr.org/ORBman/
