On 13 Mar 2002, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > The fact that MALLOC_CHECK may no be honoured by gcc is a very > different thing in fact!
Huh, gcc itself doesn't care about MALLOC_CHECK.
On 13 Mar 2002, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > The fact that MALLOC_CHECK may no be honoured by gcc is a very > different thing in fact!
Huh, gcc itself doesn't care about MALLOC_CHECK.