On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 10:48, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Bryan Paxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I think you misunderstood the problem. The patch doesn't fix the > fact that doing a double free will segfault your program. The > patch removes a double-free in zlib, which could lead to segfault > and/or compromise in zlib and in programs using zlib. Ahhh, I see...
The intention of the email was to get everyone to shut up about zlib not being patched : ) The extra was > > The fact that MALLOC_CHECK may no be honoured by gcc is a very > different thing in fact! See the next email for that (a.k.a patch working)... -- Bryan Paxton Public PGP key: http://www.deadhorse.net/bpaxton.gpg Trying, the volition devoid of action, this is idleness. Doing, the volition replete in motion, a process. Being that all things are impermanent, this process is constant. If one realizes such, the process is in all actuality, one step. A motion that can not be reversed, but may be halted. Both ways does this sway.
