On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 05:22:01 +0800 (HKT) "R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Charles A Edwards wrote: > > > urpmi is not handling all the depends needed to install, or more exactly the >depend have depend which urpmi is not handling. > > > > # urpmi libgnomeprintui2.0_0 libgnomeprintui2.0_0-devel > > To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed (27 MB): > [......] > > Is it OK? (Y/n) y > > > > error: failed dependencies: > > gtk+2.0-backend-devel = 2.0.0 is needed by libgtk+2.0_0-devel-2.0.0-1mdk > gtk+2 = 1.3.13 is needed by libgtk+2-linuxfb-1.3.13-2mdk > > libgdk_pixbuf-1.3.so.13 is needed by libgtk+2-linuxfb-1.3.13-2mdk > > libgtk+2-devel = 1.3.13 is needed by libgtk+2-linuxfb-devel-1.3.13-2mdk > > Installation failed > > You're quite correct here, since the package splitting for > glib/gtk+ is quite different between 1.3.x and 2.0. > For now, it's suggested to completely remove any packages > that depend on glib 1.3.x before installing glib-2.0. > I see that. What I do not see is why, if No glib/gtk+ pkgs are installed, that the package requires as provided to urpmi leave out gtk+2.0-backend-devel = 2.0.0 is needed by libgtk+2.0_0-devel-2.0.0-1mdk Installation failed which in turn # urpmi --curl gtk+2.0-backend-devel To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed (10 MB): libgdk_pixbuf2.0_0-devel-2.0.0-1mdk.i586 libatk1.0_0-devel-1.0.0-1mdk.i586 libpango1.0_0-devel-1.0.0-1mdk.i586 libgtk+-x11-2.0_0-devel-2.0.0-1mdk.i586 libgtk+-x11-2.0_0-2.0.0-1mdk.i586 libatk1.0_0-1.0.0-1mdk.i586 libgdk_pixbuf2.0_0-2.0.0-1mdk.i586 libglib2.0_0-devel-2.0.0-1mdk.i586 Charles
