On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 09:15:41 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote: > On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 00:22:48 +0100, Charles A Edwards wrote: > >> On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 05:22:01 +0800 (HKT) "R.I.P. Deaddog" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Charles A Edwards wrote: >>> >>> > urpmi is not handling all the depends needed to install, or more >>> > exactly the depend have depend which urpmi is not handling. >>> > >>> > # urpmi libgnomeprintui2.0_0 libgnomeprintui2.0_0-devel To satisfy >>> > dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed (27 >>> > MB): >>> [......] >>> > Is it OK? (Y/n) y >>> > >>> > error: failed dependencies: >>> > gtk+2.0-backend-devel = 2.0.0 is needed by >>> > libgtk+2.0_0-devel-2.0.0-1mdk gtk+2 = 1.3.13 is needed by >>> > libgtk+2-linuxfb-1.3.13-2mdk libgdk_pixbuf-1.3.so.13 is needed by >>> > libgtk+2-linuxfb-1.3.13-2mdk libgtk+2-devel = 1.3.13 is needed by >>> > libgtk+2-linuxfb-devel-1.3.13-2mdk >>> > Installation failed >>> >>> You're quite correct here, since the package splitting for glib/gtk+ >>> is quite different between 1.3.x and 2.0. For now, it's suggested to >>> completely remove any packages that depend on glib 1.3.x before >>> installing glib-2.0. >>> >>> >> I see that. >> What I do not see is why, if No glib/gtk+ pkgs are installed, that the >> package requires as provided to urpmi leave out >> >> gtk+2.0-backend-devel = 2.0.0 is needed by >> libgtk+2.0_0-devel-2.0.0-1mdk Installation failed > > Thanks, will fix..
I might be a problem in urpmi.. I'll check that with fran�ois.. Meanwhile, add libgtk+-x11-2.0_0 devel on urpmi command line.. -- Fr�d�ric Crozat MandrakeSoft
