On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 04:30:17 +0200, Brian J. Murrell wrote :

> --pY3vCvL1qV+PayAL
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 01:47:18AM +0200, Pixel wrote:
>>=20
>> the big job of DrakX is to customize things to the users need, but this
>> customization is not really necessary (eg: my box was first installed
>> in =
> mid
>                                                               ^^^^^^^^^
> Right!  I was hoping to start with a nice new fresh install.  With the
> complication that I want to install on an LVM LV which is why the
> live/online install would be nice.
> 
>> 99 and I only upgraded it since then with rpm/urpmi (ok I lost my
>> database once, but these things can be somewhat restored with time))
> 
> This is how I have been operating for a long time now too.  I think I
> have a lot of cruft now (old libs not in use anymore and not obsoleted
> by the same libs with newer version numbers in the name as in:
> 
> libgal11-0.11.2-3mdk
> libgal12-0.12-1mdk
> libgal15-0.15-1mdk
> libgal18-0.18.1-1mdk
> libgal19-0.19-2mdk)

We CAN't obsolete libraries, just to remove them.. This would mean a new
library would provide binary compatibility with old one and it is not the
case...

-- 
Fr�d�ric Crozat
MandrakeSoft

Reply via email to