Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
> This is just my 2 cent opinion but both libasla1 and libasla2 can co-exist > without conflict. This being the case it would seem to me to be prudent to > reintroduce the libalsa1 rpm until such time as the majority of pkg requiring > libasound.so.1 have been rebuilt. alas, things are not that bright. Seems like the libpng disease that plagued us is back with a new name... libasound :-( fortunately (hopefully?) libasound is less used than libpng... % rpm -qpR /RPMS/libSDL1.2-1.2.4-1mdk.i586.rpm | grep libasound libasound.so.1 % rpm -qpR /RPMS/libSDL1.2-1.2.4-2mdk.i586.rpm | grep libasound libasound.so.2
