On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 10:27:46 +0200
Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I maintain my systems at current cooker using urpmi so I have both
> > libalsa1 and libalsa2 installed and there was no conflict during
> > installation.
>
> and what ? libalsa1 is useless now.
My point was that because I update using urpmi I had both libalsa1 and 2 installed and
prior to this thread there had been nothing to indicate that libalsa1 is useless.
>
> NO!
> libalsa1 is dependant of kernel alsa-0.5.x whereas libalsa2 is
> dependant on kernel alsa-0.9.x.
I am not arguing just giving the info as supplied by rpm.
rpm -q --requires libalsa1
rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1
/sbin/ldconfig
/sbin/ldconfig
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
ld-linux.so.2
libc.so.6
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3)
rpm -q --requires libalsa2
kernel >= 2.4.18
rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1
/sbin/ldconfig
/sbin/ldconfig
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
ld-linux.so.2
libc.so.6
libdl.so.2
libm.so.6
libpthread.so.0
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2)
libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0)
libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1)
libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0)
libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.1)
> you can have libalsa withouth an alsa aware sound driver.
> but having libalsa1 when you know that no more driver is using 0.5.x
> api is useless
Again prior to this thread there was nothing that provided this info if both pkgs were
installed leading, at least me, to the mistaken belief that both still functioned.
Charles
