[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Oden Eriksson) writes: > On Mondayen den 29 April 2002 14.07, Florin wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Oden Eriksson) writes: > > > > there is already a script I have written, included in the bind package, > > > > which does the same thing. > > > > > > > > First, you set up a working bind configuration, then you run the script > > > > and this will chroot everything. You can even go back to your previous > > > > non-chrooted configuration. > > > > > > Yes I have seen that, thanks (but could you please rename it to something > > > that does not start with "chroot", thanks.). bind v9.x has much better > > > support for chroot than bind 8.x. > > > > and why should I rename the script may I ask ? > > Well, I'm getting annoyed everytime I want to chroot and the autocompletion > suggest chroot and chroot_bind.sh... Maybe "bind_chroot.sh" instead? Yes, I'm > a lazy slow typer... ;)
so I should change the name of the already existing script because of your completion ? You can't be serious ! > > > >And to justify the existance of this > > > package I have to quote myself from a mail sent to Geoffrey Lee: > > > > > > "Because not everyone is willing or able to migrate their 8.x zone data > > > to 9.x, and my package is an alternative just like we have sendmail, > > > postfix, etc." > > > > > > Furthermore..., I have used this package several years now for an ISP > > > that has zillions of hosts. So..., you could say it's pretty mature > > > compared to the bind 9.x series. > > > > I do not agree but I won't argue on that anyway ... > > I hope my argument is enough to keep it in contribs, I belive many will use > it when it's appropriate. So please don't remove it, if so inform me before > you do so, thanks. I think it can be useful indeed ... for at least one person ;o) -- Florin http://www.mandrakesoft.com
