On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 06:06:42PM +0200, Guy.Bormann wrote: > > So what?!! _AGAIN_, Mandrake Cooker is _not_ supposed to be used for > real world usage! > How hard is this to understand? Jeezzz, why do > people keep complaining about this?
Fuck off! I have been here working with Cooker a hell of a lot longer than you have and know exactly what Cooker is for and what it's not for! I don't need the likes of you talking down to me thank you very much. Now go and re-read my message, I said "real-world" usage, not mission critical and not even "work-place" usage. Yes, even casual, testing use has to interact with the real-world or what kind of testing would it be without real-world use? > See, above : The raison d'etre of Cooker is exactly that, namely to get an > up to date distribution and resolving all the dependency/interoperability > issues that comes with upgrading. Uhm, like a non-working Java perhaps. You seem to miss the point that making Java work with Cooker/next release of Mandrake Linux is not something that is under Mandrake's control. The java package is released as pre-compiled binaries and if it don't work with Mandrake Linux it will be Mandrake's problem to resolve, not Sun's. THIS IS MY POINT DICKHEAD! > If you want to use Cooker > "in real world usage" you are completely on your own and no guarantees are > given (and _none_ should be given) that it won't break in the meantime > towards full release. Oh thanks for your disclaimer. Now go re-read the difference between "real-world usage" and mission critical usage. I am not looking for any guarantees of usage, just clarifying the position of Mandrake when it comes time to release a Mozilla that does not work with Java. > I'm here only a few months just observing the mailing list, Well then maybe you should shut your mouth instead of opening in and immediately putting your foot into it. > Now go read it again! You really are an asshole aren't you? b. -- Brian J. Murrell
msg64506/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
