--- Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes..., it's a very sensible tightrope to walk, > either usable and less > secure, or not, I don't know how to accomplish both, > maybe someone else does?
Well, reasonable decisions have to be made. If they're going to err on the side of overextreme caution (as them seem to be with apache) they need to give an easier way to get things working than becoming an expert on apache configuration (and on how they have done theirs), something quick, easy, and obvious. > It's very hard to comply to unknown issues since no > one seems to care much > for apache2. Maybe issues would start pouring in if > an Mandrake employee took > over my apache2 packages, or..., if Mandrake would > employ me so it's more > "official"..., I really don't know... I think you're > the third or fourth > person mentioning apache2 in this forum since I > introduced it (and that's > about 3 months ago!!!)... I wish Mandrake would just switch to Apache2 since everybody else is. I can say a few things about it: - I really appreciate the work you've been doing on it - It seems a good bit faster than Apache1 (especially startup time, maybe it's because it's loading less modules) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com
