On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 05:20:53PM +0200, huug wrote:
> > Emacs is far too large, and joe/nano are far less known than vi.
>
> Nano is as well known as pico and one doesn't have to know it to be
> able to use it which is exactly why it should replace vi|emacs in
> /root).
Well, I've about 25 years experience in using and administering UNIX
machines. I've never heard of 'joe' or 'nano' and until now I thought
'pico' was a composer for mail messages within 'pine' but not an editor.
'vim' or at least any 'vi'-compatible editor ist standard for all
flavors of UNIX systems.
Liebe Gr��e, Nora.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IM-NETZ Neue Medien, Berlin http://www.im-netz.de/
WWW von Frauen f�r Frauen, Hamburg http://www.w4w.net/
Lesbian Computer Networks, Helsinki http://www.sappho.net/
