Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:34:47PM -0700, Ben Reser wrote: > > Uhh this doesn't make sense... > > [root@occipital breser]# urpmi lm_sensors > > One of the following packages is needed: > > 1- lm_sensors-2.6.2-4mdk.i586 > > 2- liblm_sensors1-2.6.2-4mdk.i586 > > What is your choice? (1-2) 1 > > To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be > > installed (1 MB): > > liblm_sensors1-2.6.2-4mdk.i586 > > lm_sensors-2.6.2-4mdk.i586 > > > > Shouldn't it just be asking me if it's okay to install liblm_sensors1 to > > satisfy the dependcy? Why does it seem to think that the two packages > > are equivalent? > > Just a note that this is still happening...
$ rpm -qp --provides /RPMS/liblm_sensors1-2.6.4-2mdk.i586.rpm | grep lm_sensors lm_sensors = 2.6.4-2mdk liblm_sensors1 = 2.6.4-2mdk $ rpm -qp --provides /RPMS/lm_sensors-2.6.4-2mdk.i586.rpm | grep lm_sensors lm_sensors = 2.6.4-2mdk According to package, they are equivalent, this is problably an error, quintela ? Fran�ois.
