>>>>> "fran�ois" == Fran�ois Pons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
fran�ois> Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:34:47PM -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
>> > Uhh this doesn't make sense...
>> > [root@occipital breser]# urpmi lm_sensors
>> > One of the following packages is needed:
>> > 1- lm_sensors-2.6.2-4mdk.i586
>> > 2- liblm_sensors1-2.6.2-4mdk.i586
>> > What is your choice? (1-2) 1
>> > To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be
>> > installed (1 MB):
>> > liblm_sensors1-2.6.2-4mdk.i586
>> > lm_sensors-2.6.2-4mdk.i586
>> >
>> > Shouldn't it just be asking me if it's okay to install liblm_sensors1 to
>> > satisfy the dependcy? Why does it seem to think that the two packages
>> > are equivalent?
>>
>> Just a note that this is still happening...
fran�ois> $ rpm -qp --provides /RPMS/liblm_sensors1-2.6.4-2mdk.i586.rpm | grep
lm_sensors
fran�ois> lm_sensors = 2.6.4-2mdk
fran�ois> liblm_sensors1 = 2.6.4-2mdk
fran�ois> $ rpm -qp --provides /RPMS/lm_sensors-2.6.4-2mdk.i586.rpm | grep lm_sensors
fran�ois> lm_sensors = 2.6.4-2mdk
fran�ois> According to package, they are equivalent, this is problably an error,
quintela ?
arghhhhh, ok, will change that :(
Fixed, a single s/%{name}/%{lib_name}/ :(
Later, Juan.
--
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they
are different -- Larry McVoy
