Scott Rainaldo wrote:

>Windoze users would assume that the 
>application crashed.
>
I didn't know that rpmdrake was ported to Windows?  =)

>Not 
>to be antagonistic, but it would be nice to see 
>some kind of explanation for the interface  
>"enhancements" to the new rpmdrake. 
>
I originally assumed that it was an early, early beta to the new 
rpmdrake, and that some other features had actually been re-written, but 
just hadn't been integrated in yet.  It's just a GUI issue, I'm sure 
that all the old functionality is still there underneath.  Or perhaps it 
was a complete re-write, in which case I would assume that they are 
still working to re-write parts of the code, but didn't have time to get 
it all done for 9.0beta2.


Reply via email to