The ability to search installed packages for un-installation, and the ability to see the files the package installed, search by description, the hiding of the ability to do updates instead of having them out in the wide open where they need to be so people know they need to be done.
On Tuesday 13 August 2002 11:49 pm, Luis Alves wrote: > I agree. > > Mircea Ciocan wrote: > > OK, I could live without the breezecom driver but today I updated > > cooker fron Saturday and saw what becomed of rpmdrake, and with all > > due respect for the coders is a steaming pile of sh..t, please explain > > to a guy who LOVED the the 8.1/8.2 style, why for God sake was > > necessary to butcher such a nice and functional utility and transform > > it in such a nonfunctional garbage ???? > > I mean those ridicolus dialogs, the imposibility of setting your own > > mirror, the butt ugly presentation of packages and so on, was anybody > > complainig that the previous incarnation was to good or what ??? > > I really can explain why was necesary to destroy on of the strongest > > points of selling of that distribution and endlessly confuse ordinary > > people converted to Linux that started to undersand to like it. > > Even more, is that the old interface available somewhere, could it > > be possible to have an old style rpm or what contribution or lobby is > > necesarry to revert to the old and nice style of rpmdrake, I have a > > strong feeling that I'm not the only one who wants back the old and > > nice interface. > > > > Mircea C. > > > > P.S. On a side note cooker insalled flawlessly on my crappy Dell > > Latitude and it works very well, also the today update made via urpmi > > --auto-select ( sniff, snifff ;) -- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ XP Home XP Pro XP Freestyle Where's XP Reliable? Or XP Secure? No matter what color you paint a turd - it's still a turd! Jason Straight
