Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just having a discussion on urpmi sources in the IRC channel. I was > wondering...is there any benefit to allowing different urpmi sources to > have different locations and names for their hdlists? If not, could the > name and location of the hdlist not be standardised, which would then > mean the user doesn't have to specify the hdlist name and location when > adding a source? Might be different for others, but first time I added a > source to urpmi I found the hdlist concept wasn't really very clearly > explained and it was a bit tricky to work out what I was supposed to be > doing...if this bit could just be skipped completely, leaving the user > just having to enter a path, wouldn't that be much easier?
urpmi.addmedia -h <name> <url_rpms> should do it on most of distant area, you may want to use urpmi.addmedia --distrib <name>? <url_distrib> too (? means optional parameter). Fran�ois.
