Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 10:58:50PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > > With all respect, newbie users aren't likely to be using sendmail, > > procmail and mutt/pine. They're going to be using KMail, or Evolution, > > and checking their mail directly through these programs. That doesn't > > leave much space for a Mandrake-created spam filter, though you could > > provide them with pre-written spam-filtering rules in their own > > filtering setups. I don't personally think this would be a good idea, > > though. > > An excellent point. As it stands now the only way to run spamassasin is > through procmail (well okay Mail::Audit too but nobody really uses that > [/me puts on flame retardent pants here]). But if you're using Kmail > and checking directly via POP or IMAP you can't use procmail so it won't > work. Which comes back to my statement that it's impossible to do
But KMail can use spamassassin directly, or so I remember reading somewhere...probably spamassassin's site itself. Vox -- Pain is the gift of the gods, and I'm the one they chose as their messenger.... For info on safety in the BDSM lifestyle http://www.the-vox.com Think of the Linux community as a niche economy isolated by its beliefs. Kind of like the Amish, except that our religion requires us to use _higher_ technology than everyone else. -- Donald B. Marti Jr.
