On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 12:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Has anyone contacted the developer of the algorithm in question?? If > not, this is all shooting in the dark. I wanna know if Mandrake has > contacted this Frauenwhoever to ask if "Free" decoding software is > indeed excluded from possible litigation??. If it is, then this thread > is a waste of time.
Heh - I just noticed it's out very own Gotz Washck who posted this to slashdot in the first place :). Maybe he can clarify. Why do you post this now when, as I mentioned, archive.org seems to show the terms changed in August last year? Is it wrong? And Jason, PLEASE DON'T SET A REPLY-TO HEADER WHEN POSTING TO THIS LIST! -- adamw
