SORRY to cause such a stir, I didn't realise I had a reply to header set, so thanks for bringing it to my attention, it was my mistake. It has now been removed. Apologies to the list for the pain in the ass.
Cheers, Jason Greenwood Ben Reser wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:24:03PM -0500, Igor Izyumin wrote: > >>Why isn't the list simply configured to re-write the header? Couldn't it just >>include both the stuff in the original reply-to and the cooker email? > > > So that people who need to get offlist replies can set a Reply-To header > and then the reply function will go to them. I do it whenver I want > someone to send me something off list to help debug. > > Just go look through all the many debates about this that have occured. > They're in the archive... >
