Le Lundi 23 Septembre 2002 15:44, Guillaume Rousse a �crit : > Le Lundi 23 Septembre 2002 15:37, vous avez �crit : > > Le Lundi 23 Septembre 2002 15:29, Guillaume Rousse a �crit : > > > Le Lundi 23 Septembre 2002 15:19, St�phane Teletch�a a �crit : > > > > If i remeber well, there are two autoconf packages, and i think the > > > > problem is one is numbered autoconf-1.3.xxxmdk, and the other one > > > > autoconf1.6.xxx.mdk. > > > > > > > > Is it normal to have two packages of the same name. > > > > > > They don't have same name, actually :-) This is to allow simultaneous > > > install of different versions. > > > > > > BTW, why use a wrapper instead of alternatives there ? > > > > I meant two autoconf are needed ? (no backward compatibility ?) > > I guess backward compatibility is broken. > > > Then why no two recode version (one older is needed for pybliographer > > which is mandatory for research users) for example ? > > I thought pybliographer problem has been solved ? > However, this is current practice: see all -compat lib packages.
I was just confused about the naming conventions : autoconf-1.3.xxx vs autoconf1.6.xxx (it seems to me the - is missing). Stef
