Le Lundi 23 Septembre 2002 18:04, vous avez �crit :
> Le Lundi 23 Septembre 2002 17:43, Guillaume Rousse a �crit :
> > Le Lundi 23 Septembre 2002 17:37, vous avez �crit :
> > > I was just confused about the naming conventions :
> > > autoconf-1.3.xxx vs
> > > autoconf1.6.xxx (it seems to me the - is missing).
> >
> > No, you're confusing:
> > autoconf-1.3 is name-version
> > autoconf1.6 is name only
> >
> > Hre are complete name-version-release for both packages:
> > [guillaume@silbermann modules]$ rpm -qa | grep autoconf
> > autoconf-2.13-14mdk
> > autoconf2.5-2.53-3mdk
> >
> > Hope this helps.
>
> You're joking ...
No, i wasn't :-(

> > autoconf-2.13-14mdk
> > autoconf2.5-2.53-3mdk
>
>  In the second one, the '-' is missing, or the second is a 2.5-2.53 version
> ???
The second package has autoconf2.5 for name, 2.53 for version and 3mdk for 
release. There is no missing dash, the *package* name is formed by 
concatenation of *software* name and *software* major version number.

Have a look into MDK RPM  HOWTO, maybe it will be more clear for you:
http://www.linux-mandrake.com/howtos/mdk-rpm/advanced.html#LIB-POLICY
-- 
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html

Reply via email to