Aleksander Adamowski wrote:
> Thierry Vignaud wrote:
>
>> d) ext3 has a much better fsck suite :
>> - currently, reiserfs / is never fcsked on boot if needed because
>> of broken fsck that refuse to check ro mounted fs (thought it
>> seems to have recently be fixed)
>> - reiserfsck don't handle std fsck's option set
>>
>>
>> ext3 + htree patch is faster than reiserfs on *creating/deleting*
>> thousands of files in 2.5bk.
>>
>>
> OK, you convinced me. In addition to your arguments, I could throw in
> that ReiserFS doesn't yet support dump for fast filesystem backups.
>
> I never had a serious problem with recent versions of Reiser, and
> always found it to be blazingly fast, but considering experiences that
> others have shared on this list, I'm looking at it in new light.
>
> ReiserFS people have an excellent vision of next-gen plugin-based
> filesystem, but it turns out it's not quite ready yet. When (if) it
> becomes ready, however, it will replace ext?fs without doubt (my
> doubt, anyway ;-) ).
>
btw. reiserfs does not *support* bad blocks marking yet, that's kinda
annoying too...
