On Monday 14 Oct 2002 11:23 am, J. Greenlees wrote: > Thierry Vignaud wrote: > snip > > > also, the 486sx (at least the first ones) did has a coprocessor; it > > was disabled but was still there (though i don't rember if it was > > missing pins or some silicon hack). > > actually, it was a bad bit of circuit if I remember correctly, the co > pro was completely un-usable because of it and the cpu was a lower price > for that reason. if I remember rightly it was a batch of i486dx's that had this problem, the fpu just couldnt add up properly given the right set of circumstances and intel had to change all the affected chips!
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 processor Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 processor James Sparenberg
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 processor James Sparenberg
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 processor Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 processor Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 processor Levi Ramsey
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 processor Yura Gusev
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 process... Levi Ramsey
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 processor Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 process... J. Greenlees
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 pr... rowland
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C... Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C... Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C... rowland
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C... Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C... Digital Wokan
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 processor Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 processor James Sparenberg
