On Thu Oct 17 14:58 -0700, David Walser wrote: > --- Levi Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maybe if you weren't using a poor excuse for a mail > > system... > > Yes, Yahoo! Mail is a poor excuse for a mail system, > but what does that have to do with anything? > > > On Thu Oct 17 14:32 -0700, David Walser wrote: > > > And GPG signatures are needed on mailing lists for > > > what reason? > > It doesn't answer that question.
GPG encryption is not needed. However, on a mailinglist which is (in theory) doing mission critical stuff, I don't think GPG sigs detract in any way. Of course, I choose not to sign my emails (partly because I don't do anything approaching mission critical on this list), but I can certainly see why Vincent (among others sign their emails. > > > It's just a waste of bandwidth: > > It doesn't change that fact. It's not a waste of bandwidth (see above). > > > GPG garbabe %#$%^$^%&$%Y JLGJBSIO $#@$#^)(@#$ > > > > > > message > > > > > > GPG garbage E%U$#Q(%O$#@(ARU(SADGJIAJ$%($FAFJSA > > Or that. That's a product of the fact that yahoo cannot handle GPG attachments. See my earlier comment. -- Levi Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Love lies in pools of questions. GPG Key Fingerprint: 354C 7A02 77C5 9EE7 8538 4E8D DCD9 B4B0 DC35 67CD Currently playing: Stone Temple Pilots - Days of the Week Linux 2.4.19-16mdk 18:00:02 up 14 days, 16:25, 14 users, load average: 0.47, 0.51, 0.38
