--- Levi Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu Oct 17 14:58 -0700, David Walser wrote: > > --- Levi Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Maybe if you weren't using a poor excuse for a > mail > > > system... > > > > Yes, Yahoo! Mail is a poor excuse for a mail > system, > > but what does that have to do with anything? > > > > > On Thu Oct 17 14:32 -0700, David Walser wrote: > > > > And GPG signatures are needed on mailing lists > for > > > > what reason? > > > > It doesn't answer that question. > > GPG encryption is not needed. However, on a > mailinglist which is (in > theory) doing mission critical stuff, I don't think > GPG sigs detract in > any way. > > Of course, I choose not to sign my emails (partly > because I don't do > anything approaching mission critical on this list), > but I can certainly > see why Vincent (among others sign their emails.
Yeah, that certainly makes sense. > > > > GPG garbabe %#$%^$^%&$%Y JLGJBSIO $#@$#^)(@#$ > > > > > > > > message > > > > > > > > GPG garbage > E%U$#Q(%O$#@(ARU(SADGJIAJ$%($FAFJSA > > > > Or that. > > That's a product of the fact that yahoo cannot > handle GPG attachments. > See my earlier comment. Well sometimes I see things as actual attachments (like file.bin or signature.asc), and the message looks clean, but sometimes I just see ASCII garbage around the message, and I'm pretty sure that's what these people are actually sending, messages with ASCII garbage rather than attachments. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com
