Selon Brian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:   
   
> On Saturday 09 November 2002 05:13 pm, J.A. Magall�n wrote:   
> > On 2002.11.09 Gary Greene wrote:   
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----   
> > > Hash: SHA1   
> >   
> > [...]   
> >   
> > > as it does now. If you want only one control center, just embed your   
> > > tools into the KDE Control Center (+the seperate one for GNOME users.)   
> >   
> > That's what I most would like. MDK can develop its own tools, but plz   
> > integrate them in standard control centers, like Gnome's one. Most people   
> > uses KDE or Gnome. For those not using any of them, sure there is one   
> other   
> > config tool widely used (linuxconf ?). So you can get your useful tools   
> and   
> > integrate them in the standard control panels. One backend and several   
> > fronts to embed them in control panels.   
>    
> I agree that the Mandrake config tools ought to be integrated into the KDE   
> or Gnome control centers. What would be super-nice icing-on-the-cake kind of    
> stuff would be if they'd do a Qt front-end to the tools so they blend with    
> the KDE control center better.   
   
Gtk library is lighter than qt and, works in all environments, and all Mdk's   
tools are already in Perl-Gtk, I agree with Mdk to keep Gtk !   
Gtk apps can be embeded in KDE control center, there is no matter.   
 
And, if they do that, you'll can navigate in control center (both kde & gnome) 
without a mouse, a  feature that MCC don't have at this time.   
   
 Also, I'd say if both KDE and Gnome put a    
> config tool into their control centers, Mandrake should count that as a    
> blessing - it's one less config tool you guys have to develop!   
   
And if kde have tool in is control center that gnome one haven't ? 
And for others environments ? 
   
> I definitely   
> don't want to see anything the KDE folks create taken out of the KDE control   
>    
> center. They put a lot of work into their tools also, and some of them I   
like   
>    
> better than the MCC alternative.   
  
Which ones ? I don't see.   
Take the exemple of Drakxres who works better and have many   
more fonctionnalities than kxconfig.   
   
>    
> Oh, while we're on the topic, I'll state my opinion that linuxconf was the    
> biggest piece of crap I have ever tried to use to configure a system, and I   
>    
> am so glad to see it disappearing from distributions. Folks who aren't using   
>    
> KDE or Gnome would be better off with the current MCC, or even with Webmin.   
>    
> --    
> Brian Smith   
>    
   


Reply via email to