> > yep crack it ;-) or make your company buy it for you .
> So, what is the point of moving to Linux then, if Windows is so wonderful
> and Linux really sucks? The "free as in free beer" (which seems to be the
> case already with cracked stuff)? Trading in the uncomfty feeling of being
> a factual thief with the uncomfty feeling that you can tweak your machine
> beyond "Next>Next>Next>Finish"?
I personnaly prefer to click on a rpm and finish (but don't like the
interdependance stuff)
but I'm trying to extract differences between linux and windows , to see
what
would enable the linux community to convert people user to linux ...
I personnaly like a lot linux but don't use it daily (I couldn't since I
program for...
windows user) and it's for this reason that I've decided to represent all
windows
user that I was unable to convert to linux .
And I think I do it quite good ...
The free answer is not an answer since personnal user that do not want to
pay
crack programs and they doesn't see it as a bad things .
The only answer linux have is the open minded one that is also to program
things
wanted and needed by user .
I would like to pass to windows but :
   in windows user and a lot of company trust because of the uniformity (not
true but....)
   in linux there are too many toolkit and embeding methodsto do the same
things , to many ,
I really like QT and kpart  from kde but there is also gtk and bonobo from
gnome ,windows maker ....
to many things are good only when fully compatible , which is not really th
case ....
don't tell me I'm not true , if I remember standart are build only for
ensuring compatibility and uniformity .

>
> My advice is to either make a choice and stop whining in the wrong place
> or to profit from both worlds and pay $$ and/or a learning curve. ...like
> anything in life...
>
Yep ...

>
> Guy
>



Reply via email to