-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Faraj Meir wrote: >>>yep crack it ;-) or make your company buy it for you . >> >>So, what is the point of moving to Linux then, if Windows is so wonderful >>and Linux really sucks? The "free as in free beer" (which seems to be the >>case already with cracked stuff)? Trading in the uncomfty feeling of being >>a factual thief with the uncomfty feeling that you can tweak your machine >>beyond "Next>Next>Next>Finish"? > > I personnaly prefer to click on a rpm and finish (but don't like the > interdependance stuff)
The fact that there are dependencies, or that rpm doesn't handle them for you (in which case you are using the wrong tool). If you don't want dependencies, do like windows does, and have each app supply the DLLs it was compiled for (official MS recommendation for Windows XP), or compile statically. In both these situations, in the case of an update, every app which uses the library will have to be updated. > but I'm trying to extract differences between linux and windows , to see > what > would enable the linux community to convert people user to linux ... A clear conscience. > I personnaly like a lot linux but don't use it daily (I couldn't since I > program for... > windows user) You could develop with wxWindows/wxGTK, and even cross-compile for windows under linux. > and it's for this reason that I've decided to represent all > windows > user that I was unable to convert to linux . > And I think I do it quite good ... > The free answer is not an answer since personnal user that do not want to > pay > crack programs and they doesn't see it as a bad things . Well, then they need to consider if they really want to be a criminal. > The only answer linux have is the open minded one that is also to program > things > wanted and needed by user . I don't think this is the only answer. Don't you guys have the BSA there? > I would like to pass to windows but : > in windows user and a lot of company trust because of the uniformity (not > true but....) > in linux there are too many toolkit and embeding methodsto do the same > things , to many , > I really like QT and kpart from kde but there is also gtk and bonobo from > gnome ,windows maker .... So, just choose one, and make that the default in your company. > to many things are good only when fully compatible , which is not really th > case .... > don't tell me I'm not true , if I remember standart are build only for > ensuring compatibility and uniformity . > Yes, more compatability between GTK/Qt and Gnome/KDE would be cool. The fact that there are two different VFS implementations is one example .... Buchan - -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE91MJDrJK6UGDSBKcRAjBqAJ9/rnaMgME514XUbGWb2S+yDKwnBQCcD1y5 4v+7OZo9r6XthlGfx1gRr/c= =G4Ib -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
