On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 11:53:06PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote: > Fix... didn't notice something Bugzilla was doing till just now: > > set reply_regexp='^(((re|r e|RE|Re|aw|antw.|antwort):[ \t]*)|(\[Cooker\] > \[Bug [[:digit:]]+\] (New: )?))*' # how to find reply's
Round 3... Bugzilla started adding a number after the Bug id but before the Summary of the bug... I have no idea what this number is supposed to represent. But here's an update to the regexp: set reply_regexp='^(((re|r e|RE|Re|aw|antw.|antwort):[ \t]*)|(\[Cooker\] \[Bug [[:digit:]]+\] ([[:digit:]]+ )?(New: )?))*' # how to find reply's Sorry to the poeple who got my test post via Bugzilla... Was trying to see if there was an obvious pattern to those numbers. Guess not... -- Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ben.reser.org "If you're not making any mistakes, you're flat out not trying hard enough." - Jim Nichols
