>> - the pop pups from rpmdrake are after all not *so* >> bad, and they are in fact easy to understand. but, >> then downloading softare from plf, there are allways >> lots of poppups, and I must stay in front of the >> monitor, and allway click : yes, I want to install (I >> know, its because I didn't downloaded the key...). But >> would be nice to have a : " yes for all" button. >Just "rpmdrake --no-verify-rpm". "rpmdrake --help" should give you the >options. But when, o when, will they finally learn? Why not put some "Not >verify RPMs" button INTO THE GUI? Why not back EACH command line option ( > there are not many ) with some GUI configuration dialog? Another possibility should be to view the key owner and let the possibility to accept or reject all RPMs from this key.
- Re: [Cooker] Mozilla 1.2B Felix Miata
- [Cooker] Propositions for rpmdrake daniel beck
- Re: [Cooker] Propositions for rpmdrake Fluri Dave
- Re: [Cooker] Propositions for rpmdrake daniel beck
- Re: [Cooker] Propositions for rpmdrake Austin Acton
- Re: [Cooker] Propositions for rpmdrake Gilles Mocellin
- Re: [Cooker] Propositions for rpmdrake Austin Acton
- Re: [Cooker] Propositions for rpmdrake Buchan Milne
- Re: [Cooker] Propositions for rpmdrake Alex Chudnovsky
- Re: [Cooker] Propositions for rpmdrake J�r�me Martin
- Re: [Cooker] Propositions for rpmdrake Ben Reser
- Re: [Cooker] Propositions for rpmd... Austin Acton
- Re: [Cooker] Propositions for rpmd... Stephen Pickering
- [Cooker] Re: Propositions for ... Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] Re: Propositions ... Stephen Pickering
- [Cooker] Re: Re: Propositions ... Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] Re: Re: Propositi... Stephen Pickering
- Re: [Cooker] Re: Re: Propositi... Fran�ois Pons
- [Cooker] Re: Re: Re: Propositi... Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] Re: Propositions ... Steffen Barszus
