Anyway, I don't feel I misreperesented anything as I had a re-read of the previous thread. The way my original request was handled was totally disrespectful IMHO. Doesn't matter, I have thick skin. You tend to grow it if you are on the cooker list for any length of time. I also notice that when a poster makes a little too much sense or if it gets hard for Mandrake (or other posters) to provide a good reason for doing what they're doing (or saying what they are saying), a thread gets dropped like a hot potato (eg, the Abiword discussion).
See Here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mandrake-cooker&m=103835752402895&w=2
Notice how I didn't really get a response on this one??
Since this list is a bit anarchistic anyway, I'll keep posting the way I feel is appropriate and if Mandrake kicks (or stops listening to me, et al) me, so be it.
Cheers
Jason
Ben Reser wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:01:09PM +1300, Jason Greenwood wrote:I agree with that methodology as well, however, there were many on the list who stated this was not the case and not the position of Mandrake on the issue.You are misrepresenting what I said. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mandrake-cooker&m=103835574301595&w=2This was a case that apparently Mandrake felt was a critical bug....
