On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 13:26, rcc wrote: > regardless of the question - which seems valid to me - why don't you > just repackage SuperFoo and remove its dependency on IBM-JDK?
I can definitely do this. What I am wanting to do is keep urpmi from doing unnecessary things. If there is no good reason for urpmi to do this new behavior then why add it? I'm hoping the urpmi developers can explain the reasoning behind it, I haven't heard anything yet. Just imagine other people who have lots of SuperFoo type applications. It becomes annoying real quick. I just want to keep a good tool from going bad. -- Steve Fox http://k-lug.org
