https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed| |1
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-01-16 10:49 -------
The chance of having dependencies of notes5clients being not seen by urpmi by a
--auto-select are tight. I have to repeat urpmi didn't check all dependencies
but it may see broken when trying to upgrade package (because it check when a
package is upgraded if using package will not loose dependencies, so why it may
find there unresolved one).
I have to check if this check are not global and be limited to broken dependencies.
I want to answer on this bug previously about the use of a configuration files
saying what is Provided, Conflicting and Required on a global status. It may
resolve correctly your problem and some others too. I like this solution but It
may need to hack rpmlib (I didn't check currently).
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
------- Reminder: -------
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
description:
I am pasting in the email I sent to the Cooker list as I have only received one
response from MandrakeSoft employees so far.
-------------------------------------------------------------
I noticed that urpmi now tries to figure out all the unresolved
dependencies on your system just like how apt does. I think this is
extremely annoying behavior and I wish I was disabled by default.
Justification:
I have an application, SuperFoo, installed. It has a dependency on IBM's
Java Runtime Environment (JRE). I need to use Sun's JRE because IBM
hasn't bothered to release one that likes gcc 3.2 yet. And I know from
my usage that it works fine with Sun's JRE. SuperFoo is a proprietary
application so I don't have the source for it. Having to repackage it
every release to remove the stupid hard requirement on IBM-JDK is
extremely annoying.
So I can install SuperFoo with straight rpm -Uvh --nodeps. Life is good
and I can use SuperFoo.
Now being the good Cooker person that I am, I do 'urpmi --auto-select'
to sync with the latest packages.
The latest urpmi says "Hey, we have unresolved dependencies! I MUST
uninstall SuperFoo!", even though SuperFoo has nothing to do with all
the other packages that I will be updating.
I hope you see where this is painful. Every time I want to update
Cooker, it will try to uninstall SuperFoo even though there is no reason
to.
Previously I have bragged to Debian users that urpmi is smarter because
it only concerns itself with the packages that are being
installed/upgraded.
Please tell me there is hope that urpmi can be made smart again?
--------------------------------------------------------------
To this Fran�ois Pons responded:
Ok, I hope I will not hurt sensibility but urpmi doesn't care if
unrelated dependencies are unresolved. *BUT* urpmi when resolving
related dependencies (and related should be understanded in the very
large part) it may add unresolved dependencies.
--------------------------------------------------------------
So my question is why would this unrelated unresolved dependency be added? Or
using the example from above, why does it want to remove SuperFoo which has an
unresolved dependency on IBM-JDK even though nothing else that I am
installing/upgrading has any requirement on IBM-JDK (or anything Java related
for that matter).
Thanks.
