On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 07:16:32 -0800, David Walser wrote: > --- "R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > The idea is if you install this you *want* that. >> BUT, >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> *THIS* idea is broken in this case. How many people >> will >> install *only* 1 theme? Generally people install >> many >> themes, and switch one by one later on if they like. >> If >> Geramik can establish itself as the default theme, >> why >> others can't? Or let them fight -- the first one >> installed wins? > > You totally misunderstand the point of Geramik. It's > not a regular Gtk+ theme. Its only usefulness is in > being the default theme, along with KDE's default > Keramik theme. In fact, Geramik is really only for > KDE users, and only they would *install* it. No Gtk+ > user is going to install it, let alone select it if > it's not default. They're not that great looking > themes, the only value in them is keeping > color/font/etc settings consistent between Qt and > Gtk+, like Bluecurve, just a bit less ugly.
BlueCurve doesn't do such a mess as Geramik package.. > Also, even given this, the way it was done before > still lets you decide to disable it as default, or > make something else default and *DOESN'T GET IN YOUR > WAY.* It took great care in this. Now it's just > totally broken and useless. It is not broken, it is now behaving as a theme package should behave.. -- Frederic Crozat MandrakeSoft
