--- Frederic Crozat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is right.. Theme packages should not screw up > default theme.. There > is no point for discussion on that..
Geramik is not a normal theme. The only useful purpose it serves is being the default theme, alongside KDE's default Keramik theme. Looks-wise neither are all that wonderful, and noone's gonna choose to use them over something else. Their only usefulness is in their consistency, it's basically the same idea as Bluecurve. > Moreover, Gemarik is more than buggy Yes, there's only one author, I'm sure he'd appreciate help. I would think having a well-working Geramik would be a desirable thing for MDK. > (try switching > from Gemarik to > another theme with gnome-theme-manager) and frankly, You said something about it not working, but that hasn't been my experience (has Gtk changed?). The only problem is, even if you switch to a different theme sometimes in newer Geramik versions a few pieces of it are still left over. I only see this in Gtk+1 though. > my only desire would > be to push it out of contrib (but I won't, don't > worry).. Well I'd rather KDE have a better default theme. Actually what might be cool is if Geramik were broken into two pieces, one that keeps the color/font/etc settings consistent between Qt and Gtk+ consistent, and another that's just the Keramiky theme. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
