On Thursday 16 January 2003 00:46, rcc wrote:
> so you can actually do work at work? :)=)
actually, it was a collegues machine.

>
> never seen it. Is it that tcl/tk thingy I never got to run?
yes, it didn't run?
>
> I like Xwine, though last time I checked the config editor was not
> implemented yet.
I'll check it too when time permits.

>
> Another thing: do we have to split wine into 4 rpms? It's a pain to
I think Thierry even wanted to split it in even more packages?

> I think wine and wine-devel would be sufficient. I've not yet
> seen an app that depends on libwine. 
Me neither, but it is consistant with the mdk lib policy.

>Some of the utils stuff seems
> better kept with wine proper.
Like? Why move all these notepad, winemine stuff to the wine program? IMO they 
should be separate.

> And putting /usr/bin files like winegcc in
> a lib-devel package looks somehow not right to me.
Well, it is used for development?

Guess I do not agree, but perhaps you can convince me?

Danny

Reply via email to