On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 23:03:13 +0100 Danny Tholen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 16 January 2003 00:46, rcc wrote: > > never seen it. Is it that tcl/tk thingy I never got to run? > yes, it didn't run? not for me, but I didn't try very hard because > > I like Xwine this looks so much nicer > > Another thing: do we have to split wine into 4 rpms? It's a pain to > I think Thierry even wanted to split it in even more packages? yes, I remember that > > I think wine and wine-devel would be sufficient. I've not yet > > seen an app that depends on libwine. > Me neither, but it is consistant with the mdk lib policy. I feared you would say that > > And putting /usr/bin files like winegcc in > > a lib-devel package looks somehow not right to me. > Well, it is used for development? I guess I don't get the logic behind mdk policy. Split libs from actual programs and then but progs in lib packages because they happen to be devel tools. Ah, it dawns on me, Thierry would probably suggest splitting out the stuff into yet another package. > Guess I do not agree, but perhaps you can convince me? too late, in both senses. Need sleep and there's a new wine package in cooker which brutally dumped our thoroughly crafted mdkconf. Regarding the native vs fake win question: I use only the fake win, so I could well live with a fake win as default. The screenshots at codeweavers showed an option to use a fake win in the user's homedir. Now, there's an idea... - Mark
