On 2003-01-19(Sun) 21:00:36 -0500, Austin Acton wrote: > I don't see any advantage of packaging the three icons as one archive. > I use the following... [........] > I don't see how that's any worse than one tarball. While it is longer, > I don't think clarity should take a back-seat to brevity.
Same as %buildroot vs $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, different people may have different practice. > Also, the skeleton should definitely include lib-stuff. > %define libname lib%name%major > and all the rest (descriptions, file-lists, depends, etc.) Not only > does this clarify the lib policy, but the packager doesn't have to > figure out the depends/provides for the libs which was VERY confusing > for me at first, and is the same 90% of the time. How about making another skeleton spec which contains the libname stuff? BTW, it's time to introduce the %mklibname macros... Abel -- Abel Cheung GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
msg86810/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
