On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 10:42, Vincent Danen wrote: > On Sun Jan 26, 2003 at 09:20:31PM -0800, Ryan T. Sammartino wrote: > > > > > The answer is libast. So Eterm needs to depend on libast1 >= 0.5-1mdk > > > > > > Ooops... I'll fix this. libast1 is updated in cooker, so an > > > --auto-select should have taken care of it... but I understand the > > > "take it from cooker and install it in 7.2" scenario so I'll add the > > > deps later... =) > > > > Hmm? I run very close to the cooker... I do: > > > > urpmi Eterm > > > > and expect that to work. > > Yes, you run "very close" to cooker... but you're not running cooker. > If you were, you would be using --auto-select, not asking for an > individual package alone. > I disagree, here. I have been using cooker for years, before the birth of urpmi. I still prefer using rpm (with simple additional scripts) than urpmi. I use urpmf extensively but don't trust urpmi enough for something sometimes as delicate as cooker.
> Needless to say, the deps do need to be fixed to specify a specific > version... Eterm now needs libast 0.5+, and I will add that. So, in > the future, this will work. > > IIRC, I modified the BuildRequires, but not the Requires... this will > be fixed today. Thanks, sincerely. -- Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
